Force-Fit vs Auto-Fit: Why "AI" Decline Curves Overstate Your Reserves
There is a specific, well-documented way to make an oil or gas well look more valuable than it is, and it hides inside one innocent-looking
There is a specific, well-documented way to make an oil or gas well look more valuable than it is, and it hides inside one innocent-looking
"Petroleum engineer" is one job title covering sub-disciplines that share a hallway and almost nothing else about their day. This is the one
Of all the petroleum sub-disciplines, drilling is the one whose mistakes call you at 2 a.m. The drilling engineer argues with a rock that&
Drilling delivers one well at a time. The production engineer inherits all of them at once — and has to keep a few hundred of them
Drilling makes the hole. Reservoir engineering says what's worth producing. The completions engineer stands in between and answers the question that makes or
Reservoir engineering forecasts the asset. Reservoir simulation builds the physics model the forecast is argued against. They sound like the same job — outsiders, and plenty
There used to be a middle in American oil and gas. A working operator could raise twenty or fifty million dollars, lease up a few
Upstream operators and energy investors run seismic, production, and sensor data on Databricks-shaped platforms billed by the second. A self-hosted open-source lakehouse is a real money and sovereignty decision for oil & gas — here's the honest version, with no invented savings numbers.
Decline-curve analysis is the load-bearing first step of almost every reserves number. We rebuilt the hard part to run entirely in the browser — matching Equinor's open-source math to 0.02 ppm, with no server and no data upload.
Three modules, sharing a Postgres backbone: ingestion, model/forecast, reporting+audit. Buildable in 4-8 weeks on $40-80/month infrastructure. The open-source replacement for the enterprise reserves stack at the bottom of the market.
Two recent reference architectures from the published literature: Equinor's Johan Sverdrup digital twin and SLB+ONGC's 2025 agentic AI framework for large-scale well modeling. Both describe the same architectural pattern.
Small E&P operators and family offices are running 2026 capital on 1990s workflows. The 2024-26 reservoir engineering literature has converged on the diagnosis: the gap is in workflow infrastructure, not algorithms.
Stage 5 of the Texas mineral valuation pipeline: the four inputs (Arps decline, price deck, lease economics, discount rate), the monthly cash-flow math, and the 13-line validation checklist that catches the recurring NPV errors.
Same well, two methods, 32% gap. The math behind why allocation-well decimal interest differs from pooled approximation, with a worked example and the PostGIS geospatial step that makes the answer defensible.
Stages 1 and 2 of a defensible Texas mineral valuation: acreage technique (43,560 sq ft, geodesic projection, source tiering) and ownership resolution (severed estates, UMI math, the 3/8 example). With an 8-line audit checklist.
Get product updates, open source notes, and relevant announcements by email.